Prepare with SAP C_S4TM_2601 exam torrent, pass for sure

A regional office technology refurbisher is adding depot-to-screening-center movements in SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management while customer outbound delivery transportation remains stable. Screening-transfer requirements from two depots should create freight units for the same central screening center. During testing, one depot creates transportation demand correctly, but the second depot's transfers are routed toward a retired internal service structure.
The active transportation network contains the screening center and intended carrier lanes. The rollout team finds that the second depot retained a legacy transportation relationship from a phased migration. The constraint is to correct only the intended screening-transfer flow without changing stable outbound delivery behavior or activating unrelated depot movements.
Which action best resolves the assignment issue?
Response:

• A. Manually redirect affected freight units to the screening center until migration data review is complete.
• B. Activate transportation relevance for all depot movements so every internal service document can be evaluated by planning.
• C. Rebuild outbound delivery lanes so every depot uses one harmonized transportation location relationship.
• D. Correct the second depot's transportation location and relevance assignment so intended screening transfers bind to the active screening-center lanes.

CHALLENGE 4 - Terminal Charges and Delivery-Level Settlement Allocation Carrier road-leg charges calculate correctly, but terminal surcharges are missing when freight orders are manually adjusted after terminal assignment. Finance can still post the settlement document, but the cost explanation is incomplete.
What should the team validate?
Response:

• A. Whether event tracking should be completed after settlement to improve cost reporting.
• B. Whether direct road shipments should be excluded from all future charge calculation tests.
• C. Whether terminal surcharges should be replaced with a single average road surcharge for easier posting.
• D. Whether manually adjusted freight orders still carry the terminal attributes required by surcharge conditions and settlement allocation.

CHALLENGE 2 - Freight Order Grouping for Dealer Route Execution
A consultant compares two freight orders for the same weekly region. One was created from correctly proposed route candidates, and one was created after manual additions. Both can be executed, but only the first supports the expected carrier route confirmation.
Which factor should drive the configuration decision?
Response:

• A. Whether the grouping attributes used before freight order creation preserve the intended route structure.
• B. Whether planners can complete manual route correction faster than automatic planning can run.
• C. Whether delivery monitoring shows all outbound deliveries before transportation planning begins.
• D. Whether both freight orders can generate any settlement document after carrier execution.

A regional mobile medical cart distributor uses SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management to plan outbound shipments for hospital go-live carts and routine depot replenishment. Automatic planning reduces freight order count, and subcontracting to the contracted carrier works correctly. However, go-live carts are consolidated with replenishment freight that has more flexible timing, causing several carts to miss hospital receiving windows tied to implementation schedules.
The implementation coordinator wants hospital receiving windows protected, while logistics wants to retain consolidation savings for routine replenishment. The constraint is to keep automatic planning and carrier subcontracting active while ensuring go-live timing is respected before freight orders are released.
Which planning decision best supports the constraint?
Response:

• A. Adjust planning criteria so hospital receiving windows restrict consolidation before freight orders are finalized.
• B. Keep the current planning setup and ask implementation coordinators to negotiate wider receiving windows after planning.
• C. Exclude all hospital go-live carts from automatic planning so implementation coordinators can manage timing manually.
• D. Increase consolidation weighting so the planning run continues reducing freight order count across go-live and replenishment freight.

CHALLENGE 2 - Depot Consolidation Timing for Freight Order Execution
Two freight orders are created for similar depot pickup flows. One follows the planned consolidation timing and supports afternoon receiving, while the other is manually adjusted and causes warehouse teams to prepare too early.
Which configuration factor should drive the next validation?
Response:

• A. Whether freight unit grouping and freight order release timing reflect depot consolidation requirements.
• B. Whether procurement can email the vendor manually whenever transport planning is delayed.
• C. Whether both freight orders can eventually receive carrier charges for settlement.
• D. Whether event tracking should be disabled until all depot pickups follow the same receiving window.